Futuristic is not Realistic?

[Pin]

As the rules say, all rules can be broken in good RP. To me, futuristic is still realistic, so I'm trying to be a futuristic Newsman, with a couple different types of camera "holders".

Open SpoilerSpoiler:

Aircraft Version



This is 100% Nocollided.

Open SpoilerSpoiler:

Land Vehicle Version



Also 100% Nocollided, not actual wheels, just props attatched by easy precision axis, thruster powered.

Just wondering about opinions on this.
P.S. It would not in any way be used to abuse [seeing into other people's bases], it would be either for camerawork or helping me guard a base :D

[bloop]

Nope not allowed it's considered a vehicle and all vehicles are banned. No collided or not. Besides we banned camera vehicles along time ago.

[Mattthezombie]

If you look in the rules I believe it states that any moving props being used as a type of "vehicle" is not allowed.

[Pin]

Alright then, I won't make them.

[Tumor]

(02-03-2013 09:07 PM)Mattthezombie Wrote:  If you look in the rules I believe it states that any moving props being used as a type of "vehicle" is not allowed.

"All rules can be broken if it is in good rp"
He is asking if he can use them if he uses good rp

[Hail]

no

unless...

many SA are actively on the server

and can monitor

but thats not gonna happen