Underage Sex

[Trollface]

hai guyz im back, i havent been on the forums/server lately but now im back.

so... underage secks, i think peoples shouldn't have secks til they're 18

unless they want stds as a present for losing their virginity

[Renegade]

I don't know, man. I'm pretty excited about finally being able to watch porn next year!
It'd help because then people would know how to do from watching a bunch of porn and whatever because they'd know how to actually do it (unlike 17-year-old's who can't watch porn).

..and then like, it wouldn't be embarrassing or something!

[Marshmellow]

(03-10-2013 01:53 PM)Trollface Wrote:  hai guyz im back, i havent been on the forums/server lately but now im back.

so... underage secks, i think peoples shouldn't have secks til they're 18

unless they want stds as a present for losing their virginity

yeah.
two virgins who have sex at 18 are much less likely to catch stds than two virgins having sex with each other at 16.


you're so retarded that it hurts
there is literally no difference between how likely you are to catch STDs as long as you choose the right partner. the 25 year old ex-hooker heroin addict isn't a good choice, to put it that way.

[Trollface]

(03-10-2013 03:47 PM)Marshmellow Wrote:  

(03-10-2013 01:53 PM)Trollface Wrote:  hai guyz im back, i havent been on the forums/server lately but now im back.

so... underage secks, i think peoples shouldn't have secks til they're 18

unless they want stds as a present for losing their virginity

yeah.
two virgins who have sex at 18 are much less likely to catch stds than two virgins having sex with each other at 16.

on the upside im a gay transsexual hooker


you're so retarded that it hurts
there is literally no difference between how likely you are to catch STDs as long as you choose the right partner. the 25 year old ex-hooker heroin addict isn't a good choice, to put it that way.

i meant your more likely to make bettr choises when yur 18 than 16

[John Nukette]

(03-10-2013 03:47 PM)Marshmellow Wrote:  

(03-10-2013 01:53 PM)Trollface Wrote:  hai guyz im back, i havent been on the forums/server lately but now im back.

so... underage secks, i think peoples shouldn't have secks til they're 18

unless they want stds as a present for losing their virginity

yeah.
two virgins who have sex at 18 are much less likely to catch stds than two virgins having sex with each other at 16.


you're so retarded that it hurts
there is literally no difference between how likely you are to catch STDs as long as you choose the right partner. the 25 year old ex-hooker heroin addict isn't a good choice, to put it that way.

LOL U GOT TROLL'D


SAGE



SWAG


2trill4u

sofahnny

[Zinc]

shut up nukette

[SecretAgentMan]

>16

>deddeh

[MrFlyingbananas]

(03-15-2013 06:11 PM)SecretAgentMan Wrote:  >16

>deddeh

Soiled It